I don't think it's necessary to have judges who are photographers. In my own experience, the juried shows I've been in, not a one of the judges was a photographer (keep in mind these were also multi-media shows). I don't feel one necessarily has to be to be a photographer, in order to be a competent judge of what makes a good photograph, if they have an art background, have experience in the art field, then they should be qualified I would think. That being said you are at the mercy of the judges whimsy and mood.... There is no set formula for what makes a winning photo... It's all personal, and if the judges are partial to any one particular type of photography or subject matter, then chances are that is the work they will choose. It's always nice to find out who the judges are before you prepare, to get an idea of what they do, style, etc... What makes an award winning photo? Well that really is hard to say.... the one that jumps out and grabs my attention the most probably.... Hmmm... Tells a story, strikes a chord emotionally, and hopefully still technically well done. And congratulations on selling 5 pieces... I think that's fabulous! You're off to a great start Michael.... Hugz!

I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com