I have the solution. It is simple and it will work. Let's define the fractal gallery, in writing, this way: The fractal gallery is an any medium gallery for any image related to fractals. Period. That's it. Yep, it's a 180 degree turn around from how I started out, but it is the only reasonable solution that I can think of. Instead of defining boundaries or drawing lines, let's erase them. Fractals occur everywhere in our software and in the universe. Bryce, for example, generates terrain from fractals. Any Bryce image with terrain would be fair game. Same for Teragen or any other software that has a hint of a fractal in it, no matter what that software is. Fractals are everywhere in nature. A picture of a flower or tree would be fair game. Astrophotography would be fair game. Bacteria, fair game. Let the artist decide if it is a fractal image. As far as not getting the correct resources for whatever software, who cares? What do you think?