AgentSmith,

Thanks for joining in, and for your comments.

It was made clear to me in the other thread, that my renders are nothing exceptional, and I agree, because I see myself as more designer, than artist, and those renders are rather "void" of any artistic quality.
If I where to post my renders to my gallery, I can't help thinking that I'd get agro for it. I appreciate that you have'nt had time to read through the other thread yet, but if and when you do, you will know why I can't risc upsetting the members here, anymore than I already have.
Thanks for the thought though :-)

drawbridgep,

As was originally intended, I hope to get PRO-RENDER out there by August 2004. You're right about no eating, sleeping, forums, or emails. I've had less sleep over the past two weeks, than I've ever known. When I announced PRO-RENDER, I had'nt reckoned on all this publicity. I looked at the threads other members where posting and thought, yeh, I'll probably get about 20 replies or something.

...yeh, I know.

Anyway, I intend to post a set of images soon. These will HAVE TO BE my final response until the release of PRO-RENDER, and yes, it's because of the manual. As I've recently pointed out to Tesign, over at DAZ. The manual is going to be a problem. I have to write it in a manner that beginners can understand, but at the same time, I have to be carefull, that the more seasoned users don't think I'm insulting their intelligence. I've only ever written one manual before, and that was for a rendering product I created for IMAGINE, on the Amiga. That was when the internet was in it's infancy, so I never got to know how the manual faired.

Anyway, I'll do my best.

Regards,

Len.

The wait can be horrific, but the outcome can be worse - pumeco 2006