Forum: Bryce


Subject: Radiosity: the facts & myths

TwistedBolt opened this issue on Jul 27, 2004 ยท 32 posts


vasquez posted Wed, 28 July 2004 at 2:39 AM

But.. .at the end... is it realy so important? light domes, true ambience, reflecting surfaces.... We are not Maya of Lightwave freaks who spend more time in math calculations than image compositing. THe only important think is the result, if the image looks convincing it's ok, if the image has some art inside it's ok, if the image has some boobs inside better! Twisted your link is really cool for the guys who didn't know that's radiosity... but your text and what you're trying to point out is not so easy, moreover adding some square lights or piramd light (ore radial light like rochr does) in the right places works better than 2-3 days renders with light dome and true ambience. just my 2 cents (Good natured harassment intended!) we can just add a new challenge: "Best fake true radiosity boobs" (fake is the radiosity not the boots)