I don't see you making any educamacated distinctions here either, sunshine. If someone is opposed to nudity, they are opposed to nudity in general, and not a naked woman in a temple specifically. I am dead against nekkid vickies because most of them, if you pardon the pun, blow goats - most of it is lack of imagination and to see how far you can push the ToS. Its just bad art. And its amazing how often bad imagery and nudity go hand in hand here. Does it make me a prude ? Probably as much as working in a tittie bar and a short stint as a dom when I was studying way back in the dark ages. But then I am from Europe, and Scandinavian to boot, we really only wear clothes for special occasions, and in order to take them off for some Swedish...documentary type film ];-) As an aside, it pisses me off on a generic, non-personal level that people at rendo who have an issue with nekkidness need to come with qualifiers or disclaimers - that should not be necessarry. It would also be a topic worth considering that it's fairly disturbing that the most generic context one sees in depicting females is naked. Bad renders happen with clothes. I cant argue that. But at least throwing something on the poor lass shows at least a smidgeon of imagination. ~S