Elizabyte...I think I'm having a heart attack...I fully agree!!My views I admit are born totally out of frustration and anger that I was branded a spammer...I still do believe,however,that if spamcop offers this list that they should make a better effort to verify that the claims are legitimate and find a better way than lumping everyone on a server together on a blacklist (by the way,they do call it a blacklist which in itself is a stupid move because you saw what I associated with that when I got angry). There are better answers Eliza...my ISP for instance not only verifys every url added to their blocklist,they also report false findings of abuse when they find it and say that spamcop is one of the sources they used to use before finding so many sites listed that either in their opinions weren't spammers or in fact were maligned because they don't consider three spam reports out of millions of emails sent to be spam...know what,they're right its not.Maybe you don't want to subscribe to Archaeology Magazine,but that doesn't make an offer direct from their official site spam because there were three complaints.

If the end goal of learning is genius...why are most geniuses failures at learning?