GoN2GraceLand opened this issue on Sep 16, 2004 ยท 64 posts
Dale B posted Thu, 16 September 2004 at 7:34 AM
GoN2GraceLand; Either get one of the shaved body detailed textures for V2 and use that, or use one of the V1-V2 genital add-on kits, dial all the detail morphs down so that you only have the external labia at a very undeveloped state, then scale it down and parent it to the PS hip. You'll still have to do some texturecolor mapping, and there may be a seam problem to disguise, but that's about the best you can do. As for what he could 'possibly' need it for..... Hmmm.... (1)A birth render. I've done a couple of those that required putting tackle on the Milbaby. Both genders. Post birth, newborn suckling for the first time. The Armani suit looked a bit silly under those circumstances, you know. (2)Skinny dipping. Kids still do that in the South, with gay abandon (oh horrors!) and no concern for adult hangups. (3)Streaking. Dinner party. Stuffy adults. Little Jonnie or Suzie making a break from bathtime, shedding water and giggles all over the place, wanting a hug or to see what all the commotion is. (4)Nude study. Sleeping child. Sleeping child with sleeping puppykitty. Sleeping child in parents arms. This list can go on, btw. (5)Being Helpful! Toddler makes connection with Mommy removing diaper when all messy. Toddler appears in doorway of before Mommy's social gathering of your choice, holding said object, rather....messy....and =proud= of the new accomplishment. (6)Historical piece. Until just -very- recently, children and little or no clothing was the norm during the hotter parts of the year. (7)Pre-histrorical. Just about everyone at some time, simply due to the fact that Pampers hadn't incorporated yet. Let's see now... Hmmm. No mention of faeries. No mention of Science Fiction or Fantasy. No mention of sexual contact of any kind, in any way, shape, or form (unless you consider breastfeeding 'sexual' in an adult context). If any of those scenarios come across as 'kiddie porn' to someone, then the problem is not within the image. It's within them, wouldn't you say?