Though I must agree with a lot of the comments made here, especially with Dale B's list of what such a model/prop might be used for, I also have to refer to Renderosity's terms of service, which states clearly: Members/Users will not use this community for; Posting Unacceptable Images or Writing Themes: No depictions of young humanoid characters/children giving the appearance of being under the age of 18 where genitals are displayed and/or in erotic, seductive, provocative poses or context. Since age is difficult to identify with 3D images, this will be at the discretion of the Renderosity team. Even though so far no images or writings have been posted in this reference, that we know of, depicting this. Its still implied. I personally don't have a problem with nudity of most any kind, however on a child, I think it is at least bizarre. Plus, though I am no anatomy expert I do have a neice, who when she was pre-school and toddler age, I took care of several times, so I have an idea of what the "pre-school" female anatomy looks like, and you can't see developed genitals like that, in most cases. It is accepted by most people in the united states, and other parts of the world, that exposed genitals on children goes against moral code, and its definately illegal in the US. Depicting a nude baby, toddler, child, in an artist's piece, such as those listed in Dale B's post is one thing, and in most situations would be harmless enough. But detailing genitalia that a child of that age would in most cases not even be developed to fully, is definately pushing some legal limits. This reminds me of a movie I saw once, which I believe was based on actual events, about a woman (and single mother) who was arrested and charged with child pornography because she innocently snapped some pictures of her naked 3 to 4 year old daughter who had just gotten out of the tub, or maybe she was changing for bed. Anyway, the damage was further impacted when more photos revealed the little girl touching the exposed pregnant stomach of the mother's friend. When she dropped the film off to be developed, it was the photo lab that reported it. In my opinion she'd done nothing wrong, but in the overall opinion of the law, she had. So, stuff like this is always a controversy.