Mark_uk opened this issue on Sep 16, 2004 ยท 19 posts
BDC posted Fri, 17 September 2004 at 7:16 AM
bjergtrold
I refer you too post # 13
Look folks,
Anti-americanism does exist, (so does anti Europeanism by the way)
Some art is anti-american. Some is anti european.
Some attitudes are anti-american as well, some are anti european. I mean what else do you suggest we call it, when the aims of of one nation is directly contradictory to the aims of the U.S.?
(ex: saying one is glad sept 11th happened, or that one is glad 3,000 were killed that day) both of wich I remind you actually were posted here in some threads, by some the day of, and following the attack.
If a person spouts off with those views, or creates art to express those veiws, then they should not cry to the ptb when someone says that they or the piece in question is anti american.
Because well thats exactly what the descriptive term for it is.
And again I must re-iterate, my problem is not really with the content of the image in question, in fact my problem is a much bigger one that deals with the apparent unfair application of the TOS. I say that due to the fact that I know of at least one other member here, (not myself either) who posted images of dead terrorists that way, and had their image yanked down after a complaint.Given that why then does the same not happen in this instance?
Message edited on: 09/17/2004 07:17
Message edited on: 09/17/2004 07:22
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell