Forum: Complaint & Debate


Subject: objects and the "not for commercial use" statment

spiffyandstuff opened this issue on Nov 19, 2000 ยท 89 posts


spiffyandstuff posted Tue, 21 November 2000 at 12:35 PM

well i might try to take that last post more seriously...... but come on, look at the grammar. SOP> apparently you didn't read the whole post, many people would agree that the rendering of the object is not incuded in the terms of use. The .obj is not being redistributed an image is! The author of the .obj is not the same as the artist who created a .jpg! I'm only picking on you because the poor word choice, people should really try to stay away from using languge made up by lazy internet junkies. Keep it in the chat room!