If he'd created a VERY similar photo of a vase of flowers the number of hits would be 1/3 or less of what it got. THAT is an insult to the well respected photographer. As is your comment about voyeurs...which is obviously meant as an insult to the viewer. Who are you to be judging the intent of the viewer? (By the way..anyone viewing any image is being voyeuristic). Maybe you are attempting to apply a pornographic connotation to the viewer...or maybe you just don't understand that some people like nudes better than others...for whatever reason...human nature is what it is and maybe you don't like the way people are...that dosen't give you the right to publicly post acrimonious vilifications of all who view a certain image...