My oh My..... Anyone, please tell me where I either: a) Slate the artist or his work? b) Say we shouldn't be allowed to look at nudes? a) The artist concerned does excellent work that I myself am jealous of - a fact which he is personally aware from my IM's! There is no way on earth my comment can be seen as a criticism towards him! b) I have NOWHERE stated that we should NOT be able to view nudes!!! I REPEAT - NOWHERE !!! I like Nudes myself! At the risk of repeating myself again, IF 200-300 PEOPLE CAN TAKE THE TIME TO CLICK ON A PICTURE BECAUSE IT HAS T&A, THEN A NON-NUDE PICTURE WITH ARTISTIC MERIT SHOULD ALSO GET AS MANY HITS. That is all I have said, throughout. As this phenomenon ONLY happens with pictures either with (or with the hint of) nudity, yes those people are voyeurs!! What else do you call the extra 270 hitters? There is no avoiding the issue that they are only drawn to the picture is because of the nudity!! Please do not use me as an excuse for a political rant - even though (brace yourself!) I AGREE with you about personal freedoms. We'd be buggered without them. Instead, be free to show me where ANY of MY comments state we should not be allowed the freedom of viewing? Having read this whole thread again, YOU have made that statement as a complete misinterpretation of mine and then attacked me for it!!!! Damn, first I get attacked for using words as they are intended, then I get attacked for NOT saying something! Nothing like a nice healthy debate, I say!!! ;-) (",)