Jack D. Kammerer opened this issue on Nov 20, 2004 ยท 55 posts
ales posted Sun, 21 November 2004 at 2:46 AM
Thank you, Jack for your time and your kind explanation. I'm a bit in this bussiness also. I undarstand what you're saying and I admire your experiences in this bussiness but by my opinion steps taken by Renderosity are w r o n g . Looks like they want to stay a huge site but unable to recognise what made them huge. I just can't imagine Renderoisty without sellers like Billy T, ect.... I wouldn't buy Renderosity's shares at the moment. They grown up because of these great sellers not because of the pay pal. It's not a question of survival - it's a suicide. Of course, Tim Choate haven't got up one morning and said: GEE, I've got an idea! Let's piss off our vendors and customers, reduce our monthly income by at least 40% and pay homage to PayPal's puritanistic views on life and business!!", but the current result on the Renderosity is exact the same. Also - the public relations and all other methods are mostly very strange. In case of real care fot community and people I would expect some organised kind of moving part of the selling programme to Renderotica instead of pushing vendors to close their stores and go away feeling offended. And finally - the majority of customers don't know anything about these brave new restrictions - they lost a great opportunitty to make huge final sells before their sinking into dark ages with a 'reliable' merchant acccount provider. I've just read also other 'understanding' postings. Let me say one thing: I don't have understanding when someone tries to carry out his restrictions on me or anybody else. And I don't care what's the global reason for them. If all the people would share the same principle there won't be pay pals (or renderositys, I don't care) with their sick private legislations.