Oh man! Does this mean we have to go put pants on all the Davinich's at the museum next?? And then what, Pants on ducks?? Aren't renders of Frankenstein, vampires, trolls, pixies, faeries, griffins, unicorns, mummies, dinosaurs all considered "fan art" too? I mean like they aren't 'original' ideas or concepts?? hmmm, what should I do next....nope, been done but Disney...perhaps...nope, one like it by Warner Bros...maybe...nope, too similar to Star Wars....how about....naw, similar to Tolkin...but I can....no, already been done by Paramount....but there's.....drat, Columbia Pictures did that in the 80's.....however....nope....nope....nope....nope.... Seems to me like 99.9% of any "art" done by anyone ever was inspired by something they had seen or experienced somewhere in their live. So I guess now only that .01% that we can come up with now is acceptable for Renderosity?? Heck, look at Hollywood these days, they can't even think of anything "original" except for one or two a decade and the other half thousand attempts fall flat on their face so they've turned to remakes and reproductions of old favorites.