Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: gallery question

PapaBlueMarlin opened this issue on Dec 01, 2004 ยท 108 posts


igohigh posted Wed, 01 December 2004 at 6:27 PM

Elizabyte; good point....if I were attempting to sell something, and yes even as an amateur hobbyist it is my responsibility to have a general knowledge for 'ignorance is no excuse' in a court of law. BUT, the topic here is how does This Community (or what's left of it) views the term "Fan Art". Actually the 'true' definition can only be made by the specific holder of any copyrighted material....one holder of say Star Trek may be offended by furry critters wearing clothes the color of the Enterprise crew (not talking about the emblem now, just the colors and clothing style) while yet another holder of say Lord of the Rings may have no opinion over a wizard in white with a long beard riding atop a white stallion. But here the issue is 'How Far Does These New Rules Going To Effect Us Members Here at Renderosity'? Yes, obvious Fan Art is Fan Art but aside from going to court to decide whether your or I can post our next render, what definition is Renderosity going to put on it? About "IM a moderator".....isn't that why these threads are popping up, because no one has come right out and explained it to the members yet? Therefore we come to the forum in hopes of finding answers. I KNOW! Lets BAN all threads that question authority!!!!