I read the article now too. Interesting. But I still try to understand what the author wanted me to tell. That he is a critical journalist? Had not much ot complain about really. Beside the non scalable windows and the missing Pro features. That he is an 3D expert? Not really in my eyes. He should show me one other application that makes it especially beginners so easy to do excellent images. All type of images when i look into our gallery here. He said it is sweatening if you want good results? Well, show me one technique that gives you that without efforts. No input, not output. Very simple. But all in all it is not too bad article. So i don't complain. To use his technique, there is always a "but". The style of this article sounds a little like a school essay. Too much menu description, not enough imagination what can be done with the features he got in the package. And no knowledge of the historical background of Vue d'Esprit when it comes to reasons for things in 5.

One day your ship comes in - but you're at the airport.