Thanks Nick for some of the clarifications, I was actually going to go back and read the review again, but the link no longer goes there and I couldn't find it under the reviews or articles sections of cgfocus so, oh well I suppose. I really do feel though that you spent a lot of time in the review rating it by some of the features it didn't have as opposed to rating the features that were there and whether or not they were useful and or whether or not they were buggy. Would I like weather effects in Vue? Sure, but reading a review I'm usually more interested in what I CAN do in a software than what I can't do, but that's just me.

Maybe it's just me, but Vue fits just fine into my workflow without the need for customizable toolbars and a re-arrangeable interface and I really like it's interface, it's organized in such a way that I have no problem getting where I need to go, so for me it doesn't NEED to be re-arrangeable. My background is primarily Autocad and so I use a customizable interface program on a regular basis, but I don't think Vue needs it. I'm really trying to keep this whole thing civil (I mean, it's a review, not the end of the world) I just thought that your review of the program could have used more analysis of how well Vue does what it does and less of how Vue 5 doesn't have what you were hoping for.

Anyway, no offense intended or taken, Happy Reviewing/Rendering

Message edited on: 12/08/2004 16:07