You may read it, but you aren't understanding it.

In answer to your questions, as phrased, with dissections in parentheses:

so, the team just like to hold up items?

No. (team? What team? There is one person regularly checking them. One. For free. In her spare time. Get real, will ya?)

they don't check them?

No. (They do check them. No is the correct answer given the construction of your question. They check them for the four things I noted in my earlier post -- the four things to which your excerpt is pointing when you read the entirety of the statement and take the context as supplied -- which you are failing to do)

does that make sense?

Yes. (assuming the unspecified context of your question is we check items, if they break out terms stated above, we won't link to them, that is. As to why, because they are only checking the items for the 4 elements I pointed out)

Now, your turn:

Are you obstinantly refusing to take the entirety of the statement as a whole?

remember: yes or no...

Message edited on: 12/23/2004 21:16

thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)