@Rayraz

I agree about the "emotionally pleasing" comment, because I have to say I was only thinking in terms of "visual" art when I made that post, and you're making a good point.

On the other hand, I don't agree about that "naked woman" comment. In effect, what you're saying is this...

(A Situation)
She's a work of art when she's a mere photograph...

(Another Situation)
...but if she's standing in front of you, gagging for it, with her panties 'round her ankles, she's nothing more than a sex machine.

In reality, that's not the case.

That situation wouldn't make her any less "visually pleasing" or change who she is, therefore it wouldn't make her any less, a "work of art" ;-)

EDIT:

@PJF

Great to see you back in the Bryce forum, you had me worried after your last PM ;-)

Message edited on: 01/05/2005 16:28

The wait can be horrific, but the outcome can be worse - pumeco 2006