My problem with the AMG package wasn't the looks of the model -- my problem was with the intial EULA that contained all of that heavily-lawyered language. No way was I going to purchase a model that I might get sued for using in an image. Sure, they toned downed the EULA later on: but the damage had already been done.

I would never accuse the creators of Dina of attempting to be "politically correct". Uh.....heh, heh....no-o-o-o-o...I don't think that the "PC" label would fit them very well.

I just think that they should have gone for the very "supermodel" look that some complain about all of the time. If they had done this, then I am willing to predict that Dina would have been a hit.

But they didn't, and she wasn't.

No.....my "PC" statements have more to do with those that constantly complain about the reality of the way that things are -- both in the marketplace and in the galleries

"Why don't landscapes get more views than pin-ups? It's not fair-r-r-r-r!"

"How come there's so much stuff for V3 in the marketplace? Why not for David?" ((Note: this question answers itself. It's obvious. It's just that some individuals don't want to admit the simple truth of the matter.))

The "PC" aspect of things comes out in an insistence upon merchants producing stuff that will not sell -- just to fit some sort of definition of "ordinary" or "normal".

A new corset for V3 will sell tons more copies than a t-shirt for David ever will or would.

---

Gotta go.

Goodnight.

Message edited on: 01/06/2005 00:15

Something To Do At 3:00AM