I'm sure it wouldn't bother you and might well bother others, as you say. Please don't think that I'm questioning your judgment or sensibilities. It's a rare pleasure to be able to converse about these subjects in a friendly and adult way :-) It's also important to know what can and can't be posted here. I was thinking more about the TOS and how, by regulating it, it allows the depiction of violence. If depictions of, say, violent rage are allowable then it would be strange if CD's image of grumpiness/annoyance wasn't. I recognise that there are grey areas where staff need to judge images on a case-by-case basis: that seems perfectly right to me. But I would be concerned if the boundaries of those grey areas were set too widely. I would think that it's in the interest of staff to be able to say to a complainant, "The TOS are clear and there's nothing in that image that breaks them," than give away hostages to fortune by expanding the grey area. Otherwise the portrayal of anything negative become proscribed, and you can't challenge something in art without portraying it. Anyway, enough of the philosophising, it's coffee time. Tell me how you like it and I'll IM you some :-)