Heart'Song opened this issue on Mar 11, 2005 ยท 131 posts
Olivier posted Sat, 12 March 2005 at 3:56 AM
hauksdottir: "There are procedures for removal of images where the member is notified exactly why the image was removed" False! I sent many emails to admins and mods to know for what exact reasons my pics were banned (I mean a true argumentation): all I got was "you break the tos" nothing more. If you call this an explanation, let me laugh! "And if someone truly wants artistic freedom to post whatever they can imagine, they can build their own website or go to another." You are completely right. Ro is certainly not a place where freedom has a meaning so far. One last word about the tos rules: during their trial at Nuremberg, most of the nazis used to say (to defend themselves) that they were just following orders and rules... The problem here is that this rule is not a good one being dicted by a not so moral puritan principle. The site should be renamed for sure: what about PURITOSITY? It sounds pretty good, no? "even Renderotica refuses child nudity" So what? Where's the big deal? Is Renderotica a reference in any kind in freedom of expression? Never heard about that. Do you mean that even pornographic sites wouldn't host Heart'Song pics? Well, you could not have been more insulting her. geoegress: Thank you for the link. I'll upload my stuff there too. :)