Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Warning to gallery members

Heart'Song opened this issue on Mar 11, 2005 ยท 131 posts


Olivier posted Sat, 12 March 2005 at 9:43 AM

Contacting the admin is completely useless as long as the ban decisions are taken with his agreement. Talking to him, just like talking to the mods here is like trying to discuss with a wall. You say there was an erection? I say there was not. You're 10 to think there was one? I can bring you 10 more people that will say the contrary. As I told, there are 5 other sites that shows this pic without any problem. Where does that lead us? That lead us to the fact that even if the tos are clear, the interpretation of these rules and their application to specific pics is a subjective process. Taking these decisions in team is better than individually for sure but that does not prevent you from mistake, specially if the whole team share the same kind of approch on those things. You did not like my analogy? I did not like the decisions taken against me neither. I could have used other comparisons inspired from History: inquisition in the middle age, talibans in Afghanistan, the Crystal Night in the nazi germany, the jewish affairs in France under the Vichy regime, the trials of Salem and so on. Each time censorship has been applied this kind of way, the system was turning into a parangon of intolerance which is one of the first signs of a growing tyrany system. So, I do maintain my analogy. It is well aaplied in this case. Why do I keep on in here? I want to give my support to the people who suffer from those abuse. What is certain is that I will never post any pic here anymore. I will never buy anything here anymore. Ban me for life if you think that solve the problem. You say I'm sickening? What is sick here is the tos themselves! Is a nude child image a perverted vision in itself? Who is insane: the one that makes such pic or the one that feels excited by it or even the one that imagine someone could be excited? The last one is like the second with a subtile diference: he projects his own perversion onto imaginary people. Both are sick. Cerainly not the author who can't be taken for responsible of the insanity of others.