It is NOT that there is sexual content. It is that there is nudity, and the model has the appearance of being underage. Having large breasts does not make an adult! Displaying the genital area of a model with the appearance of being underage IS clearly against the TOS:

"No depictions of young humanoid characters/children giving the appearance of being under the age of 18 where genitals are displayed and/or in erotic, seductive, provocative poses or context. Since age is difficult to identify with 3D images, this will be at the discretion of the Renderosity team."

If the model appears to be underage, they need to be covered. End of discussion. Teenagers, pre-teens, and children need to have their genitals covered. Bar none. If you render an image with a fae, and they are tweaked to look like an "eternally young fae", cover the crotch.

Cherubs fall under the same TOS. No matter what, if the image is depicting a young body (under 18), the genitals must be covered. If it is a baby running wild and free, the genitals need to be covered.

I understand that sometimes fae people look quite young. This stands to reason. However, the rules don't change if you place in your 'description' that they are 300 years old. If they look 12, the image goes. This is NOT a criticism of your art. However, it is an enforcement of the rules.

MorriganShadow
edited for clarity

Message edited on: 03/12/2005 10:29

Sitemail | Freestuff | Craftythings | Youtube|

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it into a fruit salad.