Attached Link: http://rendervisions.com/modules.php?name=Gallery&file=details&image_id=4277&mode=search

SndCastle- Post 92 Respectfully- thats a load of crap. Ok- no bottom nudity- fine, legs or other items covering/hideing the bottom half- fine no sexually suggestive poses-fine Then why the hell just last week was this image threatened to be pulled by Karen. Add to it distance, prominent breast, and washed out coloring and lights, genitals hidden by the pose AND the leg crease covered by a plant. http://rendervisions.com/modules.php?name=Gallery&file=details&image_id=4277&mode=search You can not tell if she is 22, 18 or 16 It's just an OPINION thats gets it banned. And a limited one at that. Solid mesurable standards are do-able- breast size (A, B, C, DD), area covered by pubic hair are mesurable. Shoot, even the MP has a mesurable standard of 80% coverage of breast. Opinions are like assholes- everyone has one and most of them stink. Mods are NO different- each with there own political agendia. The failure isn't on the artist side- it's on the admins side.