Extract: "......not because she violated the terms of agreement here, but because she had the nerve to try to expose the staff for their false accusations. I have seen the pictures myself, and I checked the terms of agreement here very carefully. She did not violate the agreement." Comment: Utterly absurd. 1 - If she had not violated the TOS, then the images would not have been removed, unless you know of some particular personal vendetta and reveal the specifics. 2 - You speak of accusations. If so, then shut your piehole before you do any more damage to the case and take it to court. False accusations are not something to be handled in this manner. 3 - You apparently did not check the TOS closely enough, or grasp the full significance of two elements: 1 - the TOS clearly lays out they they are the interpreters and arbiters of it (something you agreed to, note) and what is not stated but shouldn't need to be: they own the damn thing and can do what ever they want with it. Ergo: she did violate the rules. You just disagree with the decision -- and on an emotional basis, at that, instead of a reasoned one. Extract: "How would you hear about it? They are banned, and they are forbidden from showing their pictures in public to prove that they did nothing wrong!! If they protest their unfair treatment or ask for a public forum in which to air their greivance, they are banned permanently." Comment: That is idiocy. Think about that one for a very long time before you respond. Extract: "The rest of you - if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem." Comment: I see. That's an incredible simplistic worldview. Aside from being equivalent is social level to a third grader conceptually, it is on a level with "My commander made me do it" in usage. You say you are not new to the site -- perhaps you should exit this forum and return to the galleries -- less likelihood of your heartfelt frustration being mocked there. Or, better yet, leave this community. It is apparent that the standards to which it holds itself are not yours -- why give them the satisfaction of your eyeballs?