heroart opened this issue on Mar 16, 2005 ยท 112 posts
elizabyte posted Thu, 17 March 2005 at 6:40 AM
What part of NO is so hard to understand?
The part where a clothed figure with NO genitalia showing is targetted because there might be genitals under their clothes or something.
Seriously, an image where the figure was wearing a jewelled sort of bikini bottom. No hint of naughty bits anywhere. Pulled. The bottom "drew attention to the genitals". What kind of pervert looks at an image and thinks "Wow, I'll bet that fairy has GENITALS under that jewelled bottom!" and why are they the ones being catered to?
My point is NOT that the TOS shouldn't be followed, only that it should be clearly defined. Just what sort of clothes aren't figures allowed to wear?
The point is, if you create a fae/cherub/other naked child character, at LEAST clothe or cover the groin area.
Unless the covering you choose, which is not see through and is in no way erotic, makes certain viewers think about genitals.
bonni Message edited on: 03/17/2005 06:44
"When a man gives his opinion, he's a man. When a woman gives her opinion, she's a bitch." - Bette Davis