"What part of NO is so hard to understand?"

"The part where a clothed figure with NO genitalia showing is targetted because there might be genitals under their clothes or something."

Lol, Bonni we think alike. That was my response when I read that, damn near word for word. ;)

And that's the point. Not what other sites allow, not what you'll find from the old Masters works and not how many warnings may or may not have been recieved.
It's entirely how the TOS is perceived by someone in the position to issue warnings and bannings.
If no genitals were showing then how could the TOS have been broken?

And that's the question no mods are answering.

...... Kendra