The whole description of this situation is too vague. First, it appears DAZ was the baddie by saying it violated the EULA. But Sixus said it was their decision to pull the product. Second, there should have been no doubt from the start. They should have asked DAZ about it from the start. Third, DAZ can't have a blanket policy denying such projects, since VinaD was able to wear Vicky 2's clothes and use her textures. Did DAZ agree to allow her, or did they reach an agreement with DAZ?