There are many issues about using a FAQ to make an EULA more restrictive, however, in terms of making it less restrictive, see "estoppel" ... "waiver" and "detrimental reliance" ... I think poor Mr. Farr and Mr. Garner just need to be left alone right now. Guess there isn't any problem with second hand distribution of Lilin either, as long as it isn't for profit? If someone could clarify that for me (which is the question I should have asked as XENOPHONZ notes clearly, the one I typed doesn't cover it and was answered). My personal suspicion is that you can blame the lawyers and just feel some sympathy for the poor artists and businessmen involved who are probably just trying to do their best. On the other hand, it never hurts to clear the air if we can be polite about it.