wheatpenny opened this issue on Mar 21, 2005 ยท 425 posts
DCArt posted Mon, 21 March 2005 at 12:02 PM
While I can understand the reasoning as to why Renderosity did this (prohibiting child nudity leaves no question as to interpretation of what is acceptable or not), it opens up another can of worms. I understand that rules are rules .. and I understand that a lot of art is subject to interpretation. However, to prohibit ALL child nudity because of concerns about child pornography is, in my opinion, the equivalent of not selling textures for V3 any more because they could be used to make porn flicks.