Forum: Bryce


Subject: FYI: New Child Image Guidelines

alvinylaya opened this issue on Mar 21, 2005 ยท 22 posts


Quest posted Mon, 21 March 2005 at 2:17 PM

My take is since the TOS is seldom enforced it doesnt mean anything, but I understand the well-intentioned reasons for having these changes made. Its unfortunate but there are some real sickos out there and I do hope that Renderosity is serious and not just fanning hot air up our asses by skirting around legal issues by providing a simple disclaimer. Not that I would want to see them but I havent been made aware that such practices were taking place here although I am aware the TOS has been broken many times before and the administration has chosen to look the other way. This certainly puts a crimp on serious artists who have nothing but good intentions in showcasing the masterpiece that is the human form and in that respect this appeasement falls far short. Certainly one can tell when something is pornographic or have lascivious intent but their solution is to take a general broad brush to the matter making their work easier for them but imposing limitations to the true artist. I guess cherubs, elves and fairies are going to have to dress up from now on. In your case maybe I would edit the questionable ones and place a revision notice on them redirecting the viewer to the legitimate work at your site.