It's not the H20 that i have a problem with, i understand that it can be annoying for some to see that "Rainbow people" and others who need no effort to get into the H20 while they have to work hard (in their opinion) to get nowhere.

What i have problem with is that here is a proposal that states that pictures should be judged if they are worthy to be H20 stuff in the first place, and if they are not that they should be removed. Removing in this case means that they also would be removed from the gallery because there is no other way.

We are talking about pictures that are in no way violating the Renderosity TOS, at least, last time i looked it did not include that bad-art was a reason for removal.

This is going to be a unfair afair, it is not only going to hurt the "Rainbow People", but others as well who has nothing to do with these so-called H20 problems.

It is not a question of good or bad art, its about fair art, honest work and who is going to be judge by who and by wich standards?

Its unfair and it is going to hurt people far more than those who's ego's are being bruised for what they blatantly call sabotaging the H20.

Message edited on: 03/21/2005 14:36

Robert van der Veeke Basugasubasubasu Basugasubakuhaku Gasubakuhakuhaku!! "Better is the enemy of good enough." Dr. Mikoyan of the Mikoyan Gurevich Design Bureau.