"No where in our TOS are there any references to child porn. Only the statement that models depicted to be under the age of 18 must be clothed." OK, so why the clothing rule if not fer fear of porn persecution? Me, I ent affected as I don' do pics of childrens, but I do feel that however bluntly (which I agree with) the new improved rules are stated, they are WAY over the top. Personally, I feel that images of children done up in full war paint & evening gowns (ala Jonbenet Ramsay) are more pornografic/ wrong than ANY cherub or toddler on the beach. Oh crap....I s'pose I jus got a 'nother 1000 pics removed...? Sorry :-(

WARNING!

This user has been known to swear. A LOT!