StaceyG opened this issue on Mar 21, 2005 ยท 174 posts
andy_k posted Tue, 22 March 2005 at 6:44 AM
2 funny things here 1, 90% of the images being discussed aren't fit to be called art never mind getting compared to the old masters. If these images were created as "fine art" they've failed so miserably it's laughable and the only reason I can see that many of them exist is because they were created as the result of juvenile fantasies - that isn't art it's porn (albeit very poor quality), no matter how you dress it up or try and justify it's existance. 2, lots of people will shout and complain saying they won't post any more stuff here, they will leave and they will post on other galleries but they will invariably return when they find that puerile rubbish like this isn't welcome anywhere and that many CG galleries have incredibly high standards where images like the ones under discussion wouldn't make it to the also rans. Andy