StaceyG opened this issue on Mar 21, 2005 ยท 174 posts
Blackhearted posted Tue, 22 March 2005 at 11:06 AM
good, this has been a long time coming. im sure there are people out there who enjoy doing fairy renders for purely innocent reasons, but unfortunately there is also a large community of pedophiles who have realised for years that by slapping a pair of wings on an underage child they could post her/him in as erotic poses that they wanted - because this was no longer a child, it was a fairy. its unfortunate about male kids having to be fully clothed - i dont see why shirts are required, but if this is what it takes to finally cleanse the pedos from the 3D community (or at least the public galleries) then more power to it. again, its a shame about those who truly adore fairies for totally innocent reasons and are now forced to bundle them in parkas to render them, but im sure if those people think about it they will realise that this was a good decision. ive seen images by popular artists in the fairy mafia who had 6-year old prepubescent labia painstakingly postworked on them, it disturbed the hell out of me. unfortunately many people did post fae images for purely innocent reasons and they will now lose a form of artistic impression, and there will be people railing and raging at this decision, but i feel its for the best. and this decision came while i was working on a fae character myself, ironically. i wasnt upset at all. suffice to say that i had to change no part of the clothing to fit the new rules - that should tell you about the market it was intended for. sure your fae might have to be a bit more bundled up if they are based on child figures, so no more pasties and thongs for the preschooler, but if anything this will serve to further diversify the fairy renders with more elaborate outfits, variety in the figures used (whats wrong with an adult fae?) and i look forward to seeing the range of postworked clothing by the fine artists at rosity. cheers, -gabriel