wheatpenny opened this issue on Mar 21, 2005 ยท 425 posts
Bobasaur posted Tue, 22 March 2005 at 12:31 PM
According to what's been written by one poster in this thread, everyone who puts kids and baby's in their imagery is a child pornographer. That person did not use any religious beliefs to support their assertion. Therefore there is no basis to assume that they are a Bible beater. Apparantly other people have a difficult time looking at images of children without getting sexually aroused as well. In other words, it isn't just "Bible Beaters" vs. Renderosity.
Before they made me they broke the mold!
http://home.roadrunner.com/~kflach/