We are making changes to the TOS as it stands now.
Shirtless BOYS will be allowed.
BABIES in diapers will be allowed.
Shirtless MALE toddlers will be allowed.
NO shirtless females appearing to be under the age of 18 will be allowed AT ALL.

Well, that's reasonable. I mean, I could make a bunch of arguments about how one baby/toddler looks like another so who's to know if it's a boy or girl when it's wearing a diaper, and I could argue that a flat-chested little girl looks pretty much like a flat-chested little boy when you can't see their genitals and they have similar haircuts, BUT.... I won't. That would be extremely annoying and nitpicky, and it would open a can of worms the size of New Jersey. ;-)

Yes, I think this is reasonable as far as limiting child nudity. And I will now (amazingly) shut up about it and stop complaining, although I may make the odd ironic observation as I am wont to do. I am a big fan of "reasonableness" (despite my occasional lapses outside of it when I'm very annoyed ;-). Reasonable is good.

So, hey, carry on boys and girls. Be sure to bring in a bunch of wholly irrelvant stuff to your argument. It makes it just that much more fun to watch.

Popcorn, anyone?

;-)

bonni

Message edited on: 03/22/2005 21:10

"When a man gives his opinion, he's a man. When a woman gives her opinion, she's a bitch." - Bette Davis