logiloglu opened this issue on Mar 23, 2005 ยท 20 posts
ReBorneUK posted Thu, 24 March 2005 at 3:44 AM
To me, the posting of statues should be 'armless' (sorry!!) But unfortunately the cut-off point must be somewhere. While made of stone, this is a clear depiction of a nude male child. If it was a stone statue of a woman pleasuring herself, that would not conform to TOS either, and would probably be objectionable to most people. If it helps, the way to look at it is this; we have a limit on the quantity of pictures we can post; there are some of our pictures that we like that never make it to the gallery because of this, and we have to admire them privately or put them on our own websites. The pictures affected by TOS are just like those pictures. (",)