logiloglu opened this issue on Mar 23, 2005 ยท 20 posts
3DGuy posted Thu, 24 March 2005 at 11:57 AM
With the new TOS any random picture from the beach at summer is against the rules. Now I'm not saying there shouldn't be rules, but there's bare chested children.. and there's porn. If at a hot summers day I'm taking pictures of my nieces (age 3 and 4) having shirtless fun in the sand I'm concidered some kind of perv? Clearly sexual pictures should be taken care of, you'll get no contest from me. But that even pictures as shown in the topicstart are even in need of concideration is ludicrous IMHO. Maybe someone somewhere gets sexual satisfaction from an image like that, but does that mean the statue should get torn down? Where's does it end? Heck, there's people that get aroused by looking at an ankle, so from now on all angles must be covered. Tight clothing on women is clearly arousing to someone, so only loose clothing allowed.. or even better, burka's. My point is that there's rules.. interpreting the rules... and just plain paranoia and I'm getting the feeling that it's getting too close to the latter. Maybe.. just maybe people need to relax.
What is a friend? A single soul dwelling in two bodies. -
Aristotle
-=
Glass Eye Photography =- -= My Rendo Gallery =-