logiloglu opened this issue on Mar 23, 2005 ยท 20 posts
CDBrugg posted Thu, 24 March 2005 at 12:42 PM
I have been reading the thread on the Poser forum. For fairly obvious reasons many of them feel more threatened by the ambiguities of these new TOS. Many of them suggest that this is a pre-emptive move to cover RR and its owners against being accused/sued/the general vagaries/occasional lunacies of the civil law in the US. If so, wouldn't it be appropriate for the legal department to publish their advice so that we can at least understand it? Charles
Charles