Forum: Community Center


Subject: My Two Cents on the New TOS

Armorbeast opened this issue on Mar 25, 2005 ยท 129 posts


DarkElegance posted Fri, 25 March 2005 at 3:12 AM

yes there is child nudity in art. yes there is such a thing as "innocent" child nudity. but unfortunately, not everyone sees that or sees innocent is being harmless anymore. (sad fact of life but true even the most innocuous pose or stance can be seen by some as being titillating) Fae, pixies etc yes. I have said it myself ...are normally naked. but when you have them posing like armorbeast said in a way that there just is no need for...it is no longer innocent. and people get uncomfortable. ( personally I see very little use for child nudity. there are other ways to capture innocence in a Fae other then making them look like 6 year old provocative creatures) Now here is the crux. normally I do not deal with anything remotely underage looking. my big question rides on aiko and xinxin. I just "found" aiko3 so to speak and am in LOVE with her. but she tends even with "mature" morphs to look underage.(breast size does NOT equate over 18) I have worked and worked on her face and adore her. but she looks young. how will aiko 3 be handled? this -will- effect my future postings. if aiko 3 is not allowed nude I would appreciate a clear answer on that. not a "as a mod sees fit to judge" I want a yes or no answer on aiko 3 nudity.(xinxin just looks so so young so I know the answer on that one)

https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/



Commission Closed till 2025