Armorbeast opened this issue on Mar 25, 2005 ยท 129 posts
DarkElegance posted Mon, 28 March 2005 at 8:55 PM
either the server ate my post or it got removed. O.o but as I don't have a warning... why is it a picture of a cherub gets removed but that pick from sndcastie is still up? both babies naked. ok sndcastie has a diaper but according to the TOS that is very against it.(http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=120512&Start=37&Artist=SndCastie&ByArtist=Yes) now I have no problem with the TOS. I do not do underage art (though I worry of aiko work) so it is not a problem for me. I also have no problem with a pic of a "new year" baby. BUT (oh come on you knew there was a but) if the TOS is to be taken seriously it should at least be consistent. is the new TOS for members only? mods are absolved? personally if they are going to remove whole galleries and take down cherubs..then their own mods should be subject to the same strict rules. (note for the record. baby in diaper is not a problem to me. I just think that if cherubs are being taken down for topless or nudity..then "baby new year" should be too. fair is fair)
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/