udgang99 opened this issue on Mar 29, 2005 ยท 50 posts
svdl posted Thu, 31 March 2005 at 9:16 PM
A very interesting fact is that the Macs were MUCH slower in the Jim Burton benchmark that one would expect. A dual G4 should run circles around a midrange P4, but it doesn't when it comes to P5 rendering. Apparently the Athlon64 is the fastest CPU for Poser renders, especially when it has 1 Mb L2 cache. About RAID0: it is not a complete valid comparison, but my AthlonXP 2700 / 1 GB DDR333 /2xATA100 RAID 0 outperforms my P4 2.8 / 1.5 GB DDR400 Dual Channel /1xATA133. Not only on Poser, also on most other apps. Only games run better on that P4, but that's due to the graphics card, a Radeon 9600Pro is significantly faster than a Ti4200. I suspect the RAID 0 setup is part of the reason that the old AthlonXP rig performs better than the P4. I could break the RAID setup and run it as two separate disks, but then I'd have to reinstall all my stuff. Since I'm using that AthlonXP for a lot of other applications, this would take far too much time. It runs fine, fast and stable as it is (the machine is 2 1/2 years old and it's almost always on). I'm not going to change the machine.
The pen is mightier than the sword. But if you literally want to have some impact, use a typewriter