Stoner opened this issue on Apr 11, 2005 ยท 59 posts
CrazyDawg posted Tue, 12 April 2005 at 10:01 AM
"Lordstormdragon makes some valid points though. It's only a few extra clicks to put some clothes on the model, and an image can often be more erotic by what ISN'T shown. And there are many, many other things to depict an image of than T&A." Yes that it is. It doesn't help when you can't use a program to aide in putting on clothing or the model texture or whatever you call it for poser models looks better on a naked vicky than it does when you put clothing on it. Sorry but i'm one that as not got the hang of using DAZ Studio yet and i also believe i don't have the body or head morphs that enable others to use clothing or hair on the models. So at the moment i can only do naked models, to be honest with you all i have only done one image with a naked vicky in it which because of reasons that a few know i deleted it a long with other images. If an image contains a naked model and it is possed well enough not to show full frontal nudity then i wont knock it. If i see one with full frontal nudity or the hands of the model are placed to be suggestive then i'll make a comment on the lines it should be in the trash...that to me is not art but porn that comes from a sick mind not an artist.
I have opinions of my own -- strong
opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.