"When you see a young girl with a mini skirt up to the crack of dawn or legs parted ever so seductively or with Lolita like faces looking like they are hungry for milkshakes, is that not just as bad if not WORSE? " Why would there be anyting bad with that (or with nude images either)? Such an image does not harm anybody. Banning the images does harm both the artist and the viewers. Thus, banning the images is bad. I never stop wondering what is in the mind of those people who are on crusade against art. What is the reason for the crusade? Is it just that they want to hurt other people? This thread is an example of the fact that the crusade never stops. When they manage to ban something, they continue trying to create even more ban and stricter rules. In the end, you will notice that the only images allowed are some abstract images such as ornaments (as it used to be in some muslim countries).