I have had one clearly adult female in a completely non-sexual nude pose (my background is as an antomy and life drawing teacher) yanked for TOS because of small breast size. It was a standing pose as you would find in any unversity drawing class. I did not apeal or complain since I don't pay the bills around here (beyond my share of excessive MP purchasing binges). Yet, I have had to stick big saggy breasts on to all my figures out of prudence though I actually have a formal (and yes aesthtic) preference for smaller breasts on women... I am curious about all this pedophelia mania... I am in my thirties yet for the life of me I can not imagine someone in their twenties in a sexual way, they are babies relatively speaking... it would be too creepy. Don't pedophile prefer the Sears catalog or something? Don't they have their own sites served out of Holand or Saudia Arabia or somewhere other than UTAH? Speaking of Utah, isn't it legal in most of the US to use sexualy children of an age at which it is illegal to draw them nude given the age of consent ranges from 12-13 years old in the US South to 16 in the rest of the country? Puzzling. An american can purchase a Filopino child of 15-16 for a "bride" legaly but can not create a virtual image of a forty year old pretending to be 17? But what do I know... is this perception of mine accurate?