blaineak opened this issue on May 03, 2005 ยท 165 posts
templargfx posted Fri, 06 May 2005 at 9:32 AM
I both agree and disagree. Nudity without being marked is WRONG, Violence should be marked, but can be a hard one to do, an image anticipating violence for instance may offend someone, but others do not see it as violence as there is no actual violence occuring in the image. if you look through my gallery, I have CRAPLOADS of "just-nude-vickie" images, but 1, they are all marked, 2 the reason they are so simple is because they are material and shader node tests. why do I upload these? people are interested, and most of the time, a quick IM will get you the material from me. saying that violent based art should not be here, or is not artistic is so very historicly incorrect, look at classic art, such as those from wars, or even biblical images, violence, blood and gore everywhere. so I disagree with you here. all those poeple that come to these discussions only to say something along the lines of :Here we go again, or like I havent heard that before, and other smart ass comments need to just simply leave it out. there are new people joining everyday, and they will have never seen these discussions before (although not new, as with the HOT 20, this is my first sighting of a nudity and/or violence thread) and the only outcome of such comments are that you look like 1:an idiot, and 2:a bitch (sorry for the language) oh, and while Im giving another spill, people who put, "get out the popcorn" (especially moderators, BAD!) should stop it, it's like saying "I dont take you or your opinion seriously, I just think its entertaining" there you go LOL
TemplarGFX
3D Hobbyist since 1996
I use poser native units