Mazak opened this issue on May 15, 2005 ยท 160 posts
ynsaen posted Thu, 19 May 2005 at 1:26 PM
"Um, that is fact. Run through the market place. The most successful models have the most add-on product. That is not an unsupported theory, that is basic common statistical research that anyone who can type "Vicky", "Mayadoll" and "Possette" into the search box in the marketplace can do." That is an observation and sampling, not a factual establishment of a market truth. Research can be used to substantiate fact, but here alone is one of the least useful places for that sampling, and only shows what is -- not what could be. Shame on you, H, lol. You know better than that!!! "Ha ha ha. What ERC are you talking about. The only ERC I see in the figures available now is the full body morphs. And the ERC that allows both eyes to move together. And the ERC that allows the "grasp" dial to work. Why does that create more problems than it solves? You are going to hate my figures, lol, they are ERC'd to the MAXIMUM." Well, since the subject comes up -- supporting a figure with ERC requires additional compensations and work, increasing the time involved and increasing the costs involved in doing so. It's not only the older, more established merchants that are required to come on board, but also the newer, less establsihed ones that need to make a name for themselves -- increasing the complexity of creting support items for a figure is not the route to go -- you want to decrease them. I haven't seen yours yet, Helgard -- but yes, there are other figures out there that use python...
thou and I, my friend, can, in the most flunkey world, make, each of us, one non-flunkey, one hero, if we like: that will be two heroes to begin with. (Carlyle)