I'm curious about ya'll responses. To me the second photo looks flat - it looks like the contrast needs to be bumped up on the tree in the forground to give it more definition. I can see how one would consider the greens oversaturated if one compared the first picture with the second one, but just as a stand-alone image the lack of contrast in the front tree seems more significant than the saturation of the greens. Maybe it's because I'm looking on a Mac monitor (1.8 gama compared to a 2.2 gamma Windows monitor)???? (Just trying to double-check my eyes...)

Before they made me they broke the mold!
http://home.roadrunner.com/~kflach/